Berglund Awakens, Blues Start Their Break

January 24th, 2012 | by David Rogers |

Berglund Awakens, Blues Start Their Break

Patrik Berglund

Earlier today I posted an article about Patrik Berglund’s struggles and how he has fallen well below the point-per-game pace we saw in 2010-11. I discussed whether a trade was a possibility and how any deal involving #21 would be a difficult one to execute. Well, Berglund responded. Something, potentially the article from earlier (One can dream), spurred Berglund on to his best and most impressive performance of the year as the Blues fell to the Penguins in a shootout. Now the Blues will enjoy some significant time off as the NHL takes its All-Star break.

Message received, loud and clear Mr. Berglund. We knew you had it in you. You played with fire and tenacity and used your large size as the advantage it is.

Unfortunately, even a big game from Patrik Berglund wasn’t enough to carry the Blues past the Penguins as the shootout once again proved to be a huge area of weakness for the Blues. Pittsburgh’s Marc-Andre Fleury really stole the show, robbing the Blues on numerous occasions. The shootout has been a real negative for the Blues this season – something which might come back to haunt them at the end of the year. Tonight’s loss moved St. Louis to a record of 1-6 in the shootout, or five points left on the table. In the ridiculously competitive West, each and every point is a critical one.

The Blues now enter the break still looking for an answer to the question of reliable offense that has plagued them all season long. Berglund’s play on Tuesday was huge, but will he be able to replicate it down the stretch? The last thing Berglund needs after his strong showing is the All-Star break which will keep the Blues off the ice until February 3rd.

The Blues hope to return Alex Steen after the All-Star break concludes. Andy McDonald’s timeline is a bit foggier. McDonald’s return is a bit of a question mark for me as I struggle to imagine a scenario where he can jump right back into action and be the McDonald of old. His adjustment to the speed of the NHL may take time – time the Blues may not have to patch their offense. Steen brings a bit more certainty and will be a notable upgrade. His speed and endless pursuit should be a nice boost.

Will a healthy Steen and McDonald be enough for the Blues? Honestly, I’m not sure it would be. I don’t think McDonald will be capable of the production fans hope he will make and that leaves us with Steen as the lone reinforcement. At this stage a trade seems like more of an “if” than a “when”. An upgrade is clearly needed and I’m not so sure the organization has an answer for it within their current ranks.

Tags: ,

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
miendiem 5 pts

Since this worked so well, are we going to get a series of posts for Chris Stewart, Matt D'Agostini, and maybe Jamie Langenbrunner coming out of the ASB? heheh

David Rogers 7 pts moderator

miendiem Now that's an idea! Ha. Probably not, so if the struggles continue I suppose you can blame me for them.

David Rogers 7 pts moderator

Here's a thought after Berglund's big night: Was it enough to make the Blues want to retain him or did it bump up his value enough to move him in a deal? Could really be viewed either way.

Can't wait to see what happens.

miendiem 5 pts

David Rogers Still have, what, twelve or thirteen games until the trade deadline? Following Hitchcock's example, I'm trying not to get too high (or too low) off of this one showing. It was a great effort, no doubt about it. Now let's see if he can repeat it against LA, and Nashville, and Ottawa, and... If he can actually turn this into a decent couple of weeks, the desire to keep him rises. If he backslides, then not.

I'd hate to give up a guy with this much upside, even when he's down, unless we could get equal value, though. There's no reason to downgrade just because a guy's having an off year. If we can't get that, or better, pull off another steal like the Shattenkirk trade*, then I can't in good conscience say trade the guy.

* - Yeah, I know you're still withholding judgment until we see how the draft pick they got turns out. I say we've already come out on top for a year and a half, so unless the kid turns into the next Hull/Gretzky/Stamkos/etc, he's not gonna turn the tide on the deal.

miendiem 5 pts

Regardless of all of the trade speculation I did a couple of days back in that absurdly long multi-comment reply, I'm still of the belief that nothing will get done, whether or not it's reasonably available given the pieces the Blues could conceivably give up, if the ownership situation doesn't get finalized before the trade deadline. In that scenario, I expect at most a scenery change move along the lines of a Berglund (if this game wasn't him finally turning on the jets for the year) or D'Agostini (similarly) for a similar type of player in skill/age/contract length/dollars, and at least, probably a move of Bishop and any other pending unrestricted free agents at Peoria that the team doesn't intend to resign for whatever they can get in future considerations/draft picks.

One last comment, on the game in general: This was the fourth game in six nights for the boys, and they actually did manage to find their wheels and draw even and really pressure the Pens after getting in a bad spot down two goals. Could it have been better? Sure. Any game where we don't bury the opponent by three or four goals could have been better. But after the Wings game, and then getting down in this one, it was nice to see this year's Blues come charging back out and knot it up. Last year, they don't do that.

miendiem 5 pts

If the Blues want to go deep, the simple fact of the matter is this: The guys they have now, returning injured or otherwise, are going to have to find a way to find the back of the net on a more regular basis. Capitalize on chances, whatever you want to call it, the boys are going to have to find a way to do it more regularly. (Blues postgame on KMOX is saying exactly the same thing right now.)

I know Stewart was doing well playing with Backes, but I've really liked his play with Langenbrunner the last couple of games. Sure, he doesn't have points to show for it yet, but he's at least been a visible force on the line. Similarly with D'Agostini tonight - while he didn't have the goals that Berglund got, he at least wasn't the ghost on the ice that he's been so often in the past couple of weeks.

The worry about McDonald is certainly a potential issue, but one thing I think he will bring back to the team whether or not his timing is immediately ready at the NHL level is another honest-to-goodness speed threat. Just adding another player with that dimension to the lineup gives opponents one more thing to have trouble matching up against. Similarly for Steen, and we can hope that he'll be back in the mix in nine days against LA.

A quick hit on the shootout: The points sitting there on the table are an issue, no doubt about it. That said, games won in regulation and overtime (the ROW column on the NHL.com standings) actually becomes the first tiebreak once the season is over. So, there is some kind of penalty for the Detroits and San Joses and Colorados of the West who can't finish their business by playing real hockey.

Aaaand I found the character limit again. (1/2)